Why the study?
Does ventricular tachyarrhythmia induction or unsuccessful atrial shock alter the pattern of FF intervals during atrial fibrillation in patients with a dual-chamber defibrillator?
Does ventricular tachyarrhythmia induction or unsuccessful atrial shock alter the pattern of FF intervals during atrial fibrillation in patients with a dual-chamber defibrillator?
VF induction and ineffective atrial shocks lead to dynamic changes in AF patterns, including shortened atrial cycle length and decreased organization, which may inform step-up protocols for atrial cardioversion.
VT induction effects on AF in dual-chamber ICD patients are hypothesis-generating; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: The pattern of FF intervals during atrial fibrillation (AF) has been analyzed in induced and spontaneous AF episodes, after the induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and after atrial shock, in order to suggest practical considerations for AF management in patients implanted with antitachycardia devices. METHODS: In 13 patients implanted with a dual-chamber defibrillator, FF intervals were analyzed during two separate induced AF episodes, before and after VF induction over AF, as well as during spontaneous AF episodes and after unsuccessful atrial shocks. The following parameters were considered: mean atrial cycle length (CL), atrial CL stability, and standard deviation of the atrial cycle. RESULTS: The AF pattern had comparable characteristics considering two separate inductions of AF, as well as spontaneous AF episodes. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia induction resulted in a shortening of atrial CL (P < 0.02) and in a less organized AF pattern (P < 0.005). Changes in the FF interval after ineffective shock therapy showed a shortening of AF cycles after shocks with energies far below the defibrillation threshold. CONCLUSIONS: (a) The AF pattern is reproducible in separate inductions of sustained AF and in spontaneous episodes, (b) dynamic changes involving a shortening of the AF cycle and an evolution to a less homogeneous pattern occur after VF induction, revealing a complex interplay between AF and VF, and (c) FF interval analysis after ineffective shock delivery may allow the relationship between delivered shock energy and effective defibrillation energy to be estimated, thereby providing practical suggestions for step-up protocols in atrial cardioversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boriani et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: