Why the study?
Cardiorespiratory fitness is not routinely screened in pediatric oncology, and healthy VO2max cut-points are unavailable to identify childhood cancer survivors at elevated cardiovascular risk.
Does the 6-minute walk test accurately predict cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) in childhood cancer survivors?
Does the 6-minute walk test accurately predict cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) in childhood cancer survivors?
The 6-minute walk test, combined with waist-to-height ratio, age, and sex, provides a valid and accessible method to predict cardiorespiratory fitness and identify cardiovascular risk in childhood cancer survivors when CPET is unavailable.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support fitness screening in survivors via simple algorithm; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Cardiovascular disease is up to 10 times more likely among childhood cancer survivors compared to siblings. Low cardiorespiratory fitness is a modifiable risk‐factor for cardiovascular diseases. Yet, cardiorespiratory fitness is not routinely screened in pediatric oncology, and healthy VO 2max cut‐points are unavailable. We aimed to predict cardiorespiratory fitness by developing a simple algorithm and establish cut‐points identifying survivors’ cardiovascular fitness health‐risk zones. We recruited 262 childhood cancer survivors (8–18 years old, ≥1‐year posttreatment). Participants completed gold‐standard cardiorespiratory fitness assessment (Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test [CPET; VO 2max ]) and 6‐minute walk test (6MWT). Associations with VO 2max were included in a linear regression algorithm to predict VO 2max , which was then cross‐validated. We used Bland–Altman's limits of agreement and Receiver Operating Characteristic curves using FITNESSGRAM's “Healthy Fitness Zones” to identify cut‐points for adequate cardiorespiratory fitness. A total of 199 participants (aged 13.7 ± 2.7 years, 8.5 ± 3.5 years posttreatment) were included. We found a strong positive correlation between VO 2max and 6MWT distance ( r = 0.61, r 2 = 0.37, p < 0.001). Our regression algorithm included 6MWT distance, waist‐to‐height ratio, age and sex to predict VO 2max ( r = 0.79, r 2 = 0.62, p < 0.001). Forty percentages of predicted VO 2max values were within ±3 ml/kg/min of measured VO 2max . The cut‐point for FITNESSGRAM's “health‐risk” fitness zone was 39.8 ml/kg/min (males: AUC = 0.88), and 33.5 ml/kg/min (females: AUC = 0.82). We present an algorithm to reasonably predict cardiorespiratory fitness for childhood cancer survivors, using inexpensive measures. This algorithm has useful clinical application, particularly when CPET is unavailable. Our algorithm has the potential to assist clinicians to identify survivors below the cut‐points with increased cardiovascular disease‐risk, to monitor and refer for tailored interventions with exercise specialists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizrahi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: