Why the study?
Does an intraoperatively custom femoral prosthesis improve subjective outcomes compared to a cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients undergoing hip replacement?
Does an intraoperatively custom femoral prosthesis improve subjective outcomes compared to a cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients undergoing hip replacement?
An intraoperatively custom-manufactured femoral prosthesis can be produced in about 40 minutes without greatly extending operating time, with early subjective outcomes comparable to standard cemented prostheses.
No subjective difference at one year in this case; leaves open whether intraoperative custom femoral prostheses improve outcomes over standard cemented THA.
A system has been developed that allows the surgeon to match a prosthesis to any femoral cavity. The surgeon may choose how and where it will preferentially fit. The surgeon does not have to create a cavity to suit a premade prosthesis. The system is based on a novel technique for making a mold of the prepared femoral cavity. This is accurately and thoroughly measured using a laser. An implant is designed and manufactured while the operation is in progress using state-of-the-art computer and machining techniques. All important parameters such as neck length, offset, and anteversion are fully variable intraoperatively. To date, more than 800 consecutive procedures have been carried out. In a limited trial, no subjective difference was found with a cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasty at one year. It currently takes about 40 minutes to manufacture the implant and make it available in the operating room, and this time is being continually reduced. Using a femur first approach, operating time is not greatly extended. In the future, perhaps the operating time will not be extended at all. All data including cavity geometry are centrally recorded for analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulier et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: