Why the study?
Do multisensor and multisource data fusion schemes improve atrial and ventricular activity detection compared to current methods in coronary care monitoring?
Do multisensor and multisource data fusion schemes improve atrial and ventricular activity detection compared to current methods in coronary care monitoring?
Multisensor data fusion techniques may improve the accuracy of automated arrhythmia detection and reduce false alarms in coronary care units.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support testing of data fusion in coronary care monitoring; leaves open clinical validation for reducing false alarms.
Information management for critical care monitoring is still a very difficult task. Medical staff is often overwhelmed by the amount of data provided by the increased number of specific monitoring devices and instrumentation, and the lack of an effective automated system. Specifically, a basic task such as arrhythmia detection still produce an important amount of undesirable alarms, due in part to the mechanistic approach of current monitoring systems. In this work, multisensor and multisource data fusion schemes to improve atrial and ventricular activity detection in critical care environments are presented. Applications of these schemes are quantitatively evaluated and compared with current methods, showing the potential advantages of data fusion techniques for event detection in noise corrupted signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: