Why the study?
In contrast to rotavirus A, a complete genotyping system for rotavirus C had not been established due to limited or incomplete sequence data.
The study establishes a new cut-off value of 82% for RVC G-types, leading to the reclassification of strains and identification of new genotypes, expanding knowledge of RVC genetic diversity.
Rotavirus C (RVC) is an important cause of gastroenteritis in humans and pigs and has also been detected in cattle, ferrets, minks, and dogs. Incidental zoonotic transmissions have been described. In contrast to rotavirus A (RVA), a complete genotyping system for RVC has not yet been established due to limited or incomplete sequence data. In this study, 138 complete nucleotide sequences for VP7 (G-type) and 97 complete nucleotide sequences for VP4 (P-type) of porcine RVC-positive samples have successfully been generated and genotyped. Together with available sequences from the NCBI database, phylogenetic analyses were conducted, cut-off values were re-evaluated, and the current classification system was adapted. Pairwise identity frequency analyses revealed a new cut-off value of 82% instead of the previous 85% for the G-type and confirmed the current cut-off value of 85% for the P-type. This resulted in the identification of 21 G-types and 39 P-types, including 4 new G-types and 10 new P-types. The results of the investigations expand the existing knowledge about the genetics of RVC and demonstrate the enormous diversity of porcine RVC sequences in particular.IMPORTANCEThis article provides a new sequence data set of porcine rotavirus C (RVC) strains. The extended full-length analysis of RVC G-types and P-types enabled us to review the current classification system. According to the guidelines of the rotavirus classification working group (RCWG), the results led to a new cut-off value of RVC G-types and required the reclassification of numerous RVC G-types. In addition, several new genotypes have been found. The present work closes the aforementioned knowledge gap and provides important, comprehensive data for RVC genetic diversity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Euring et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: