Why the study?
Does indapamide SR/amlodipine improve systolic blood pressure reduction compared to enalapril/amlodipine in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
Does indapamide SR/amlodipine improve systolic blood pressure reduction compared to enalapril/amlodipine in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
In older patients with uncontrolled hypertension, dual therapy with indapamide SR and amlodipine provided greater systolic blood pressure reduction than enalapril and amlodipine.
Indapamide SR/amlodipine may lower SBP more in elderly hypertensives; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
To examine the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of indapamide sustained-release (SR)/amlodipine compared with enalapril/amlodipine in patients 65 years and older with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) on monotherapy, a post hoc analysis of the NESTOR trial (Natrilix SR vs Enalapril in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetics With Microalbuminuria) was conducted. NESTOR randomized 570 patients (n=197, aged ≥65 years) with hypertension (systolic BP 140-180/diastolic BP <110 mm Hg) to indapamide SR 1.5 mg or enalapril 10 mg. If target BP (<140/85 mm Hg) was not achieved at 6 weeks, amlodipine 5 mg was added with uptitration to 10 mg if required. A total of 107 patients aged 65 years and older received dual therapy (53 indapamide SR/amlodipine and 54 enalapril/amlodipine). Amlodipine uptitration occurred in 22 and 24 patients, respectively. At 52 weeks, mean systolic BP (±SE) reduction was significantly greater with indapamide SR/amlodipine vs enalapril/amlodipine 6.2±2.7 mm Hg (P=.02). Indapamide SR/amlodipine was also associated with a greater BP response rate (88% vs 75%, respectively). Both regimens were well tolerated. Indapamide SR/amlodipine may be more effective than enalapril/amlodipine for lowering systolic BP in patients with hypertension aged 65 years and older.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanon et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: