Nicotine at concentrations mimicking habitual smoking potentiates arterial contraction through direct and indirect PKC activation, providing a mechanism for smoking-related cerebrovascular risk.
Suggests PKC-mediated nicotine effects on cerebrovascular risk in animals; leaves open human translation and therapeutic implications.
Cigarette smoking is a significant risk factor in the incidence of cerebrovascular disorders. Among the many compounds in cigarette smoke, nicotine is considered to most significantly affect cerebral arterial tone. The purpose of this study is to investigate precise pharmacological effects of nicotine on the regulation of cerebral arterial tone. To mimic smoking, a low concentration of nicotine (10(-6) mol/L), which is equivalent to the serum level of habitual smokers, was treated for 1 hour in an isometric tension study and for 24 hours in a study using cultured vascular endothelial cells (VECs). Using the canine basilar artery, the effect of nicotine on uridine 5'-triphosphate (UTP)-induced vasoconstriction was examined in the isometric tension study. Protein kinase C (PKC) activity in the canine basilar artery was measured by enzyme immunoassay. Endothelial function was assessed by endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and endogenous nitric oxide (NO) synthesis in VECs using a fluorescent indicator, diaminofluorescein-FM diacetate (DAF-FM/DA). Nicotine significantly enhanced UTP-induced contraction and PKC activity in the artery, and attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and NO synthesis in VECs. Because PKC activity was increased by de-endothelialization itself, endothelial dysfunction by nicotine enhances PKC activity. Because PKC was further activated by nicotine even in the de-endothelialized artery, nicotine directly affects PKC activities in smooth muscle. These results indicate that nicotine potentiates contractile response through direct and indirect PKC activation in the canine basilar artery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koide et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: