Why the study?
Data were limited on the relationship between the cardio-ankle vascular index and non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices in non-hypertensive populations.
Do non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices (TG/HDL-C, TyG, METS-IR) correlate with increased arterial stiffness in non-hypertensive subjects?
Do non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices (TG/HDL-C, TyG, METS-IR) correlate with increased arterial stiffness in non-hypertensive subjects?
Non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices, particularly the fasting triglyceride and glucose index (TyG), are significantly associated with increased arterial stiffness in non-hypertensive individuals.
IR indices may inform arterial stiffness risk models; leaves open predictive value and need for longitudinal validation.
Data are limited on the relationship between the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and non-insulin-based insulin resistance (IR) indices, including the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C), fasting triglyceride and glucose index (TyG), and metabolic score for IR (METS-IR). In this study, we explored the relationship between TG/HDL-C, TyG, METS-IR, and the risk of increased arterial stiffness (CAVI ≥ 8.0) and compared their ability to detect arterial stiffness in the non-hypertensive Chinese population. A total of 3,265 non-hypertensive subjects were included. Spearman's and partial correlation analyses were used to assess the relationship between non-insulin-based IR indices and CAVI. The correlation between these indices and the risk of a CAVI ≥ 8.0 was explored by multiple logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to compare the ability of TG/HDL-C, TyG, and METS-IR to detect a CAVI ≥ 8.0. After adjustment for confounding factors, linear regression analysis showed that the CAVI changed by 0.092 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.035-0.149] per standard deviation increase in TyG. While, this linear relationship was not found when analyzing TG/HDL-C and METS-IR. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the proportion of patients with CAVI ≥ 8.0 in the fourth quartile of TG/HDL-C [Q4 vs. Q1: odds ratio (OR) 2.434, 95% CI 1.489-3.975], TyG (Q4 vs. Q1: OR 2.346, 95% CI 1.413-3.896), and METS-IR (Q4 vs. Q1: OR 2.699, 95% CI 1.235-5.897) was significantly higher than that in the lowest quartile. The area under the curve that could discriminate CAVI ≥ 8.0 was 0.598 (95% CI 0.567-0.629) for TG/HDL-C, 0.636 (95% CI 0.606-0.667) for TyG, and 0.581 (95% CI 0.550-0.613) for METS-IR. In this study, we demonstrated a significant association between increased arterial stiffness and non-insulin-based IR indices. Among them, TyG showed better discriminatory ability than TG/HDL-C or METS-IR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: