Why the study?
Does candesartan reduce infarct size and improve LV function in a canine model of reperfused myocardial infarction?
Does candesartan reduce infarct size and improve LV function in a canine model of reperfused myocardial infarction?
AT1R blockade with candesartan reduces infarct size and improves LV function in a canine model of ischemia-reperfusion, potentially via AT2R activation and downstream signaling.
May support AT1R blockade in ischemia-reperfusion models; leaves open translation to human reperfused MI.
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the cardioprotective effect of angiotensin II (AngII) type 1 receptor (AT(1)R) blockade during in vivo ischemia-reperfusion (IR) might be associated with an increase in AngII type 2 receptor (AT(2)R) protein, as well as 1,4,5-inositol trisphosphate type 2 receptor (IP(3)R) and protein kinase C(epsilon) (PKC(epsilon)) proteins and cyclic guanosine 3',5' monophosphate (cGMP). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the effects of the AT(1)R blocker, candesartan, on in vivo left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function and remodeling (echocardiogram/Doppler) and hemodynamics during canine reperfused anterior infarction (90-minute ischemia, 120-minute reperfusion), and ex vivo infarct size and AT(1)R/AT(2)R, IP(3)R, and PKC(epsilon) proteins (immunoblots), and cGMP (enzyme immunoassay). Compared with controls, candesartan (1 mg/kg intravenously over 30-minute preischemia) inhibited the AngII pressor response, decreased preload and afterload, improved LV systolic and diastolic function, limited LV remodeling, decreased infarct size (55% vs 27% risk; P <.000003), markedly increased AT(2)R, IP(3)R, and PKC(epsilon) proteins in the infarct zone, but not the AT(1)R protein, and increased infarct more than noninfarct cGMP. CONCLUSIONS: The overall results suggest that cardioprotective effects of AT(1)R blockade on acute IR injury might involve AT(2)R activation and downstream signaling via IP(3)R, PKC(epsilon), and cGMP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jugdutt et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: