Why the study?
Do intraventricular flow energetic indices and vortex kinetic energy differ between ischemic heart disease patients and healthy individuals?
Do intraventricular flow energetic indices and vortex kinetic energy differ between ischemic heart disease patients and healthy individuals?
Vortex kinetic energy assessed by phase-contrast MRI correlates with LV ejection fraction and could serve as an alternative marker of LV performance in ischemic heart disease.
Intraventricular flow assessment in ischaemic heart disease is hypothesis-generating; leaves open its diagnostic or prognostic utility.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the intraventricular flow dynamics in ischaemic heart disease patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with normal ejection fraction and 16 patients with reduced ejection fraction were compared with 20 healthy individuals. Phase-contrast MRI was used to assess intraventricular flow variables and speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess myocardial strain and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. Infarct size was acquired using delayed-enhancement MRI. RESULTS: The results obtained showed no significant differences in intraventricular flow variables between the healthy group and the patients with normal ejection fraction group, whereas considerable reductions in kinetic energy (KE) fluctuation index, E' (P<0.001) and vortex KE (P=0.003) were found in the patients with reduced ejection fraction group. In multivariate analysis, only vortex KE and infarct size were significantly related to LV ejection fraction (P<0.001); furthermore, vortex KE was correlated negatively with energy dissipation, energy dissipation index (r=-0.44, P=0.021). CONCLUSION: This study highlights that flow energetic indices have limited applicability as early predictors of LV progressive dysfunction, whereas vortex KE could be an alternative to LV performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: