Why the study?
Oncological therapies may impair endothelial function, but the optimal methodology for monitoring endothelial function to identify cardiovascular late effects in childhood cancer survivors remains under debate.
Monitoring endothelial function in childhood cancer survivors is essential for early identification of cardiometabolic risk, despite ongoing debate over optimal assessment methodologies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Endothelial dysfunction assessment may aid early CV risk detection in cancer survivors; leaves open optimal methods and intervention timing.
Assessment of endothelial dysfunction in cancer survivors may have a role in the early identification of non-communicable diseases and cardiovascular late effects. Oncological therapies may impair endothelial function. Therefore, in patients such as childhood cancer survivors who could benefit from early cardioprotective pharmacological interventions, it is essential to monitor endothelial function, even if the optimal methodology for investigating the multifaceted aspects of endothelial dysfunction is still under debate. Biochemical markers, as well as invasive and non-invasive tools with and without pharmacological stimuli have been studied. Human clinical studies that have examined lifestyle or cancer treatment protocols have yielded evidence showing the involvement of lipid and lipoprotein levels, glycemic control, blood pressure, adiposity, inflammation, and oxidative stress markers on the state of endothelial health and its role as an early indicator of cardiometabolic risk. However, with regards to pharmacological interventions, cautious interpretation of the result attained whilst monitoring the endothelial function is warranted due to methodological limitations and substantial heterogeneity of the results reported in the published studies. In this narrative review, an overview of evidence from human clinical trials examining the effects of cancer therapies on endothelial disease is provided together with a discussion of endothelial function assessment using the different non-invasive techniques available for researchers and clinicians, in recent years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crocco et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: