Why the study?
Do childhood cancer survivors have a higher cardiovascular risk profile compared to a matched noncancer population?
Do childhood cancer survivors have a higher cardiovascular risk profile compared to a matched noncancer population?
Cardiovascular risk estimates for childhood cancer survivors are notably higher when cancer-specific models incorporating cardiotoxic treatment exposures are utilized instead of general population calculators.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification relies on assessment of nonmodifiable (age, sex, family history) and modifiable (weight, tobacco, physical activity, blood pressure, glucose/lipid levels) risk factors. Cancer therapy, itself a potential risk factor, may alter metabolism in long-term survivors of childhood cancer resulting in premature acquisition of age-related modifiable CVD risk factors. For survivors exposed to cardiotoxic therapies, the risk for CVD is significantly augmented by obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. An understanding of these risks may not be well communicated as survivors return to primary care and general population screening practices may be insufficient. Lipshultz and colleagues recruited childhood cancer survivors to return to their treating institution for a comprehensive clinical assessment. Interestingly, compared with a noncancer age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-matched National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey population, cardiometabolic profiles were largely similar. However, cancer survivors had a higher prevalence of prehypertension/hypertension (38.4% vs. 30.1%, P = 0.04) and a lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (11.9% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.05). Applying general population CVD risk calculators and a cancer-specific model from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, risk estimates were notably higher when cardiotoxic cancer treatment exposures were included. See related article by Lipshultz et al., p. 536.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel A. Mulrooney (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: