Key result
Prediction models incorporating traditional cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatments achieved AUCs ≥0.70 for predicting heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke in cancer survivors.
Why the study?
Childhood cancer survivors face elevated risks of heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke, and may benefit from prediction models incorporating both cardiotoxic cancer treatments and traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
Can prediction models incorporating traditional cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatment exposures accurately predict incident heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke in childhood cancer survivors?
Population
22 643 Childhood Cancer Survivor Study participants and 5056 siblings
Comparison
Cancer survivors vs sibling comparators across traditional and treatment-related risk factors
Design
Cohort study with discovery and replication cohorts
Follow-up
Through age 50 years
Authors
Loading...
May support risk stratification in childhood cancer survivors; leaves open need for external validation before clinical use.
Cohort (n=27,699)
Can prediction models incorporating traditional cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatment exposures accurately predict incident heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke in childhood cancer survivors?
Traditional cardiovascular risk factors combined with cancer treatment history effectively predict long-term risk of heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke in adult survivors of childhood cancer.
Chen et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Childhood cancer survivors (n=27,699). Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatment exposures vs. Siblings was evaluated on Incident heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke. Prediction models incorporating traditional cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatments achieved AUCs ≥0.70 for predicting heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke in cancer survivors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: