Key result
Vasoprotective CV therapies improve endothelial dysfunction induced by anticancer treatments to potentially optimize oncology outcomes.
Why the study?
Endothelial dysfunction is a key contributor to cancer pathophysiology and a determinant of cardiovascular responses to anticancer therapy, yet cancer therapy-related endothelial dysfunction remains a neglected frontier in oncology. The opposing effects of cardiovascular and anticancer therapies on endothelial function have critical therapeutic implications requiring an integrated pathophysiological perspective.
This narrative review highlights the critical role of endothelial dysfunction in both cancer progression and cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity, advocating for vasoprotective strategies in oncology care.
Hypothesis-generating for cardio-oncology risk assessment; leaves open whether targeting endothelial dysfunction improves clinical outcomes during anticancer therapy.
Although endothelial dysfunction (ED) is a hallmark of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), it is also being increasingly recognised as a key contributor to cancer pathophysiology and a determinant of the cardiovascular response to anticancer therapy. Dysfunctional endothelial cells in primary tumours and metastatic organs play a critical role in cancer cell intravasation and extravasation, whereas systemic ED in patients with cancer drives CVDs. Nevertheless, anticancer therapies, such as conventional chemotherapy, kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates, drive cancer therapy-related ED (CTR-ED) and thus contribute to cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT). In contrast, major CVD therapies such as statins, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve endothelial function. It is now evident that the opposite effects of CVD and cancer therapies on endothelial function-improving or worsening it, respectively-have critical therapeutic implications. Therefore, this narrative review provides an integrated pathophysiological perspective on ED in cancer, highlighting endothelial cells as a key pathophysiological component of the tumour microenvironment, metastatic organ, and systemic circulation involved in the regulation of primary tumour angiogenesis, metastasis, and systemic inflammation, as well as contributing to CTR-CVT, thus highlighting ED as a determinant of therapeutic outcomes in oncology. Nevertheless, ED, and particularly CTR-ED, represents a neglected frontier in anticancer therapy, calling for a paradigm shift toward endothelium-safe and vasoprotective treatment strategies in cancer care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smęda et al. (2026) conducted a review in Endothelial dysfunction in cancer and cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. Anticancer therapies and cardiovascular disease therapies was evaluated. Anticancer therapies drive endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular toxicity, whereas vasoprotective cardiovascular therapies improve endothelial function and may optimize oncology outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: