Why the study?
What are the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with mitral stenosis treated with percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy?
What are the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with mitral stenosis treated with percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy?
Patients with mitral stenosis who achieve a large mitral valve area (>2.0 cm2) immediately after PTMC maintain long-term procedural benefits with fewer clinical complications and functional limitations.
Supports targeting post-PTMC MVA >2.0 cm² to avoid events; extends observational data but leaves optimal endpoints open.
Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC) is limited. Ninety-four middle-aged (51+/-9 years) mitral stenosis patients who underwent successful PTMC were followed up with annual echocardiography for 6.1+/-1.4 years. PTMC success was defined as either mitral valve area (MVA) >1.5 cm2 or a MVA of more than twice the pre-procedural value, together with no worsening of mitral regurgitation >grade 2+. Mitral valve replacement (MVR), worsening of congestive heart failure (CHF), and thromboembolism were sought for survival analysis. Restenosis was defined as loss of more than 50% of the initial procedural MVA gain. Functional limit of daily activities was assessed through a questionnaire. The study population was divided into group 1 (post-procedural MVA >2.0 cm2), group 2 (MVA > 1.5 cm2 and < or = 2.0 cm2) and group 3 (MVA < or = 1.5 cm2). The 6-year survival with freedom from MVR, CHF, thromboembolism, and combined events (MVR+CHF) was 92%, 95%, 91%, and 88%, respectively. No group 1 patient experienced MVR or CHF. Restenosis was predominant in group 3. Deterioration of daily activities during follow-up was not observed in group 1; however, it was significant in group 2 (p<0.05) and group 3 (p<0.001). These results demonstrated that patients who attained a large MVA (>2.0cm2) immediately after PTMC maintained their procedural benefit with less clinical complication and with less limitation of daily activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saeki et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: