Why the study?
What are the predictors of increased mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy?
What are the predictors of increased mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy?
A higher ratio of effective balloon dilating area to body surface area predicts a significant increase in mitral regurgitation following percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy.
EBDA/BSA ratio may warrant caution in balloon sizing during PMBV; leaves open prospective validation before guiding practice.
Left ventriculography (LVG) was performed to assess severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) on a scale of 0-4+ in 157 patients before and immediately after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy (PMV). There were 129 women and 28 men aged 51 +/- 1 (range 13-87) yr. With PMV, mitral valve area increased from 0.9 +/- 0.1 cm2 to 2.0 +/- 0.1 cm2 (P less than .0001). Increase in mitral regurgitation (MR) occurred in 69 patients (44%). Patients were divided into two groups based on increase in MR after PMV. Group A (n = 136) had 0-1+ increase in MR. Group B (n = 20) had greater than or equal to 2+ increase in MR after PMV. The only predictor of increase in MR greater than or equal to 2+ was the ratio of effective balloon dilating area to body surface area (EBDA/BSA). EBDA/BSA was 4.0 +/- 0.1 cm2/m2 in Group A vs. 4.37 +/- 0.2 cm2/m2 in Group B (P = .02). Follow-up of patients in Group B showed: Four patients remained NYHA Class III and required mitral valve replacement 4.3 +/- 1.1 (range 5-21) mo after PMV. One patient who had undergone combined aortic and mitral valvotomy died in the hospital of worsening heart failure. One patient died 1 mo later of sepsis related to a dental abscess. Follow-up of the remaining 14 patients at 9.5 +/- 1.1 (range 2-7) mo showed 10 in NYHA Class I and four in NYHA Class II. Eight of 15 patients (53%) who had repeat left ventriculogram at 9.0 +/- 0.8 mo after PMV had a decrease in MR of one grade when compared to LVG immediately after PMV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roth et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: