Why the study?
Current methods for quantification and monitoring of cardiac functions in embryonic zebrafish mostly involve tedious manual work and inconsistent estimations.
Does a deep learning-based framework (ZACAF) accurately assess cardiac function in embryonic zebrafish compared to manual processing?
Does a deep learning-based framework (ZACAF) accurately assess cardiac function in embryonic zebrafish compared to manual processing?
A deep learning-based framework (ZACAF) can accurately and automatically assess cardiac function in zebrafish embryos from standard microscopic videos, offering a high-throughput alternative to manual processing.
May streamline zebrafish cardiac phenotyping; leaves open validation in mammalian models before clinical translation.
Zebrafish is a powerful and widely-used model system for a host of biological investigations including cardiovascular studies and genetic screening. Zebrafish are readily assessable during developmental stages; however, the current methods for quantification and monitoring of cardiac functions mostly involve tedious manual work and inconsistent estimations. In this paper, we developed and validated a Zebrafish Automatic Cardiovascular Assessment Framework (ZACAF) based on a U-net deep learning model for automated assessment of cardiovascular indices, such as ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) from microscopic videos of wildtype and cardiomyopathy mutant zebrafish embryos. Our approach yielded favorable performance with accuracy above 90% compared with manual processing. We used only black and white regular microscopic recordings with frame rates of 5-20 frames per second (fps); thus, the framework could be widely applicable with any laboratory resources and infrastructure. Most importantly, the automatic feature holds promise to enable efficient, consistent and reliable processing and analysis capacity for large amounts of videos, which can be generated by diverse collaborating teams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naderi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: