Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To determine the difference between the standard and a modified (zero-compression) Hansatome microkeratome head (Bausch & Lomb) in the incidence of epithelial defects. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. METHODS: Ninety-three patients (186 eyes) with a mean age of 39.1 years +/- 9.5 (SD) having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in both eyes were enrolled in a prospective randomized study using intraindividual comparison. In 1 eye, the flaps were created with the Hansatome microkeratome using the standard Hansatome head and in the other eye, the flaps were created with a microkeratome head with a modified design (zero-compression head). Intraoperative evaluation of epithelial defects was done using a standardized protocol. Statistical evaluation was performed with McNemar and Bowker tests. RESULTS: Epithelial defects occurred in 21 eyes (22.6%) in which the standard head was used and in 2 eyes (2.1%) in which the zero-compression head was used. In the former group, 15 (16.1%) of the epithelial defects were larger than 1.5 mm(2); the remaining 6 (6.4%) were smaller than 1.5 mm(2). In the latter group, both epithelial defects were smaller than 1.5 mm(2); both patients also had an epithelial defect in the eye in which the standard Hansatome head was used. The difference between the 2 Hansatome heads in the incidence (P<.001, McNemar) and size (P<.001, Bowker) of the epithelial defects was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The Hansatome microkeratome with a zero-compression head significantly reduced the occurrence of intraoperative epithelial defects. The change in the construction of the Hansatome head is a useful improvement in LASIK technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kohnen et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: