Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article develops a framework linking affective practices with urban transformation, emphasizing relational dynamics of space.
Placemaking is widely promoted as a tool for belonging and urban transformation, yet its affective dimensions remain undertheorized. This article develops a framework for placemaking as an affective practice, arguing that sense of place is best understood through the relational dynamics of affect. Drawing on Lefebvre’s spatial triad, I show how governance often privileges conceived space while overlooking lived dimensions. Distinguishing affect from emotion, I demonstrate how embodied and social interactions generate atmospheres that shape how places are governed. Building on assemblage thinking, I conceptualize placemaking as a distributed process where affect binds material, social, and institutional forces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naomi Rommens (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: