Key result
Pediatric MASLD is linked to abnormal cardiovascular structure and higher LVH risk at 2 years.
Why the study?
Does metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) predict subsequent subclinical cardiovascular damages in children?
Cohort (n=1,161)
Does metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) predict subsequent subclinical cardiovascular damages in children?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MASLD in childhood is associated with the development of subclinical cardiovascular damages, including increased carotid intima-media thickness and left ventricular hypertrophy, within 2 years.
INTRODUCTION: The clinical utility of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in predicting subsequent subclinical cardiovascular damages in pediatric population remains poorly understood. METHODS: Data on 1,161 Chinese children aged 10-15 years were used to assess the longitudinal associations of MASLD with subsequent subclinical cardiovascular measures. RESULTS: Compared with relatively healthy children, children with MASLD had abnormal vascular and cardiac structures, along with reduced cardiac diastolic function at the 2-year follow-up. In addition, children with MASLD had a significantly increased risk of high carotid intima-media thickness and left ventricular hypertrophy. DISCUSSION: These findings support the clinical utility of MASLD in predicting the development of subclinical cardiovascular damages in childhood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiao et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=1,161). Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) vs. Relatively healthy children was evaluated on Subclinical cardiovascular measures. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in children was associated with abnormal vascular and cardiac structures and increased risk of left ventricular hypertrophy at 2 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: