Why the study?
Targeting inflammation is a priority for preventing recurrent atherothrombotic events, prompting the comparative assessment of ASA plus colchicine versus DAPT in acute minor ischemic stroke.
Does colchicine added to ASA reduce recurrent non-fatal strokes compared to DAPT in patients with acute minor ischemic atherothrombotic stroke?
Does colchicine added to ASA reduce recurrent non-fatal strokes compared to DAPT in patients with acute minor ischemic atherothrombotic stroke?
In an interim analysis, low-dose colchicine combined with ASA showed a non-significant trend towards reducing recurrent non-fatal strokes compared to DAPT in acute minor ischemic stroke, with a similar safety profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Colchicine plus aspirin may lower recurrent stroke risk in minor atherothrombotic events; leaves open superiority to DAPT in larger trials.
Influence on inflammation is currently becoming a priority target for the prevention of recurrent atherothrombotic events, including stroke. In 2022, we planned the KOLCHIDA study, a two-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial with endpoint assessment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06102720). The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative assessment of the clinical effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel and the combination of ASA with colchicine in patients in the acute period of “minor” ischemic atherothrombotic stroke. The purpose of this publication is to present the basic concept of the protocol, its design and the first intermediate results. Material and methods. The intervention consisted of colchicine 0.5 mg/day in addition to ASA versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with non-severe ischemic stroke. 31 patients were included in the colchicine and ASA group, and 34 patients were included in the DAPT group. Results. In the comparison group, 7 (20.6%) recurrent non-fatal strokes were recorded, in contrast to the colchicine group, where acute vascular events were recorded in only two patients (6.5%) [RRR 2.2, NNT = 7, χ2 = 2, 9, p = 0.09]. There were no clinically significant bleeding or other adverse events in both groups. Conclusion . Interim results of the study indicate possible confirmation of the hypothesis that anti-inflammatory therapy with low doses of colchicine in combination with standard therapy is not inferior to the combination of ASA and clopidogrel, and perhaps more effectively reduces the number of early neurological deteriorations and recurrent ischemic strokes in patients in the acute period of mild atherothrombotic stroke with equal security profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Зыков et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: