Why the study?
Intracardiac flow hemodynamic patterns are considered an early sign of diastolic dysfunction, prompting investigation into right ventricular diastolic dysfunction between patients with PAH and PH-CLD using 4D-Flow cardiac MRI.
Does 4D-Flow CMR-derived vorticity differentiate right ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with different pulmonary hypertension etiologies compared to standard echocardiography?
Does 4D-Flow CMR-derived vorticity differentiate right ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with different pulmonary hypertension etiologies compared to standard echocardiography?
4D-Flow CMR-derived vorticity is a sensitive method to differentiate right ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with different pulmonary hypertension etiologies who have similar Doppler echocardiography profiles.
4D-Flow CMR vorticity may differentiate RV diastolic dysfunction across PH subtypes; hypothesis-generating for validation in larger cohorts.
Intracardiac flow hemodynamic patterns have been considered to be an early sign of diastolic dysfunction. In this study we investigated right ventricular (RV) diastolic dysfunction between patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and pulmonary hypertension with chronic lung disease (PH‐CLD) via 4D‐Flow cardiac MRI (CMR). Patients underwent prospective, comprehensive CMR for function and size including 4D‐Flow CMR protocol for intracardiac flow visualization and analysis. RV early filling phase and peak atrial phase vorticity (E‐vorticity and A‐vorticity) values were calculated in all patients. Patients further underwent comprehensive Doppler and tissue Doppler evaluation for the RV diastolic dysfunction. In total 13 patients with PAH, 15 patients with PH‐CLD, and 10 control subjects underwent the 4D‐Flow CMR and echocardiography evaluation for RV diastolic dysfunction. Reduced E‐vorticity differentiated PAH and PH‐CLD from healthy controls (both p < 0.01) despite the same Doppler E values. E‐vorticity was further decreased in PAH patients when compared to PH‐CLD group ( p < 0.05) with similar Doppler and tissue Doppler markers of diastolic dysfunction. A‐vorticity was decreased in both PAH and PH‐CLD groups compared to controls but with no difference between the disease groups. E‐vorticity correlated with ejection fraction ( R = 0.60, p < 0.001), end‐systolic volume ( R = 0.50, p = 0.001), stroke volume ( R = 0.42, p = 0.007), and cardiac output ( R = 0.30, p = 0.027). Intracardiac flow analysis using 4D‐Flow CMR derived vorticity is a sensitive method to differentiate diastolic dysfunction in patients with different PH etiology and similar Doppler echocardiography profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cain et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: