Why the study?
Two-dimensional longitudinal strain predicts cardiac events in aortic stenosis but requires manual editing that affects accuracy and reliability, prompting evaluation of fully automated 2D strain software.
Does fully automated 2D longitudinal strain analysis predict cardiac events in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis?
Does fully automated 2D longitudinal strain analysis predict cardiac events in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis?
Fully automated 2D longitudinal strain analysis, particularly left ventricular global longitudinal strain, provides significant independent prognostic value for predicting cardiac events in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis.
Automated LS may aid prognosis in asymptomatic AS; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Two-dimensional (2D) longitudinal strain (LS) predicts cardiac events in aortic stenosis (AS). However, it requires manual editing, which affects its accuracy and reliability. We investigated whether left ventricular (LV), left atrial (LA) and right ventricular (RV) LSs using fully automated 2D strain software provide useful prognostic information in asymptomatic AS. METHODS: We performed LS analyses in 340 asymptomatic patients with AS using novel, fully automated 2D strain analytical software (AutoStrain, Philips) to obtain LV global LS (LVGLS), LALS, RV free wall LS and RVLS. The primary end point was a composite of cardiac events, including cardiac death, heart failure hospitalisation, myocardial infarction or ventricular tachyarrhythmia. RESULTS: During a median of 24 months follow-up, 46 patients reached a primary end point. 62 patients had aortic valve surgery. All four LSs were significantly associated with the primary end point using univariate analysis (HR 0.821 to 0.951, p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that LVGLS (HR 0.873 to 0.888, p<0.05) remained significantly associated with cardiac events, even after adjusting haemodynamic measures of AS severity and LV ejection fraction. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed median values of both LVGLS (cut-off: 15.1%) and LALS (cut-off: 22.3%) provide a significant difference in cardiac event rate (3-year event-free rate; LVGLS: 89% vs 76%, p=0.002; LALS: 89% vs 76%, p=0.001). Classification and regression-tree analysis, including four LSs, clinical characteristics and traditional echocardiographic parameters, selected LVGLS and E/ε' for stratifying a high-risk group of patients with cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Fully automated 2D LS analysis, especially LVGLS provides useful prognostic information in asymptomatic AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitano et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: