Key result
A lower PM:L3 ratio was significantly associated with discharge to a care facility rather than home following emergency laparotomy (mean 0.951 vs 1.128, p<0.001).
Why the study?
This study evaluated the association between the PM:L3 ratio and discharge destination in patients admitted from home who underwent emergency laparotomy.
Does PM:L3 ratio predict discharge destination in emergency laparotomy survivors?
Cohort (n=433)
No
Does PM:L3 ratio predict discharge destination in emergency laparotomy survivors?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.951% vs 1.128%
p-value: p=<0.001
The PM:L3 ratio measured on a single axial CT slice can help predict whether emergency laparotomy survivors will be discharged to a care facility or back home.
May aid preoperative planning for post-laparotomy discharge destination; leaves open prospective validation of PM:L3 in risk models.
Aim Psoas muscle:L3 vertebra (PM:L3) ratio is a relatively new risk assessment tool for emergency laparotomy(1,2) based upon the proven concept that sarcopenia – as diagnosed by low skeletal muscle index(3–6), psoas muscle density(7–9) or total psoas area(10–13) in a single axial slice CT image – correlates with increasing risks of bad outcomes in surgery. This study looks into the association between PM:L3 ratio of emergency laparotomy patients from home and their discharge destination. Method We performed an analysis on patients in the Hunter Emergency Laparotomy Audit (HELA) database, from January 2016 to December 2017. HELA is a retrospective review of all emergency laparotomy undertaken in a discrete area in NSW, Australia. All patients admitted from home, survived to be discharged from hospital and had an available CT abdomen were included (N = 433/562). A single slice axial CT image at the L3 endplate level was analysed using ImageJ® software to measure the area of L3 and bilateral psoas muscles. Results PM:L3 ratio is significantly lower in the group of patient discharged to a care facility than the group discharging back to their previous home residence (mean 0.951 vs. mean 1.128, p < 0.001). Upon further analysis, the PM:L3s are divided into quartiles and stratified by sex. There is an association between lower PM:L3 and risk of discharging into a care facility (Q1 22.45%, Q2 19.59%, Q3 19.10%, Q4 5.71%). Conclusions PM:L3 ratio can predict the discharge destination of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ming et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Emergency laparotomy (n=433). Lower PM:L3 ratio vs. Higher PM:L3 ratio was evaluated on Mean PM:L3 ratio in patients discharged to a care facility vs home (p=<0.001). A lower PM:L3 ratio was significantly associated with discharge to a care facility rather than home following emergency laparotomy (mean 0.951 vs 1.128, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: