Key result
This atlas chapter reviews the experience of living with cardiovascular disease from the perspective of female survivors, identifying barriers to care and providing targeted recommendations.
Why the study?
Recognizing and understanding the barriers, facilitators, and factors affecting care from the patient perspective is a key step in transforming clinical practice for women with cardiovascular disease.
This review highlights the unique patient perspectives, barriers, and needs of women living with cardiovascular disease to guide improvements in clinical practice and care patterns.
Alerts clinicians to sex-specific barriers in female CVD survivors; leaves open validation of targeted recommendations.
In recent years, public awareness campaigns have targeted knowledge gaps and inequities in care while focusing on the unique female experience and heightened cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile. Recognizing and understanding the sex and gender constructs, barriers, facilitators, and factors that affect access, treatment, and recovery after an acute cardiac event from the unique patient perspective is a key step in transforming clinical practice and care patterns. The aim of this atlas chapter is to provide a knowledge review and to identify gaps regarding the experience of living with CVD from the perspective of the female survivor. The sections are as follows: (1) experiencing and living with CVD as a woman; (2) "stopped at the gate": barriers to accessing acute cardiovascular care; and (3) action items to "open the gate" to women: what our patients want and need. The final section culminates with targeted recommendations stemming from recent literature and most importantly, from women with the lived experience of CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colella et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. This atlas chapter reviews the experience of living with cardiovascular disease from the perspective of female survivors, identifying barriers to care and providing targeted recommendations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: