Key result
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as the gold standard for biventricular volume and function quantification compared to routine echocardiography.
Comparison
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) vs Echocardiography
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May support selective CMR use when echocardiography is inconclusive; leaves open outcome impact and implementation barriers.
Cardiac magnetic resonance is highlighted as the gold standard for biventricular volume and function quantification, potentially overcoming the inaccuracies of routine echocardiography in mild right ventricular dilatation or impairment.
Fernández‐Golfín et al. (2009) conducted a review in Cardiac diseases. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) vs. Echocardiography was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as the gold standard for biventricular volume and function quantification compared to routine echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: