Why the study?
Does serial ultrasound screening at size-based intervals safely monitor aneurysm growth and prevent rupture in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Does serial ultrasound screening at size-based intervals safely monitor aneurysm growth and prevent rupture in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms?
This study supports a policy of annual ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms measuring 2.5-3.9 cm and 6-monthly screening for those ≥4.0 cm.
Supports size-based ultrasound surveillance for small AAAs; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of safety.
A prospective study of 99 patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms was undertaken using serial ultrasound to assess the optimum screening interval. Fifty-three patients had aneurysms measuring 2.5-3.9 cm and 46 patients aneurysms of 4.0-4.9 cm. Aneurysms measuring 2.5-3.9 cm were screened annually and those > 4.0 cm every 6 months. There were eight deaths in the 2.5-3.9 cm group, none attributable to a ruptured aneurysm and five patients have had their aneurysm repaired. Nine patients died in the 4.0-4.9 cm group, one with a ruptured aneurysm measuring 5.6 cm at her previous screening visit and who was unfit for operation. No other patient had an aneurysm which ruptured between scans. There were seven elective repairs in this group. No patient died following elective operation in either group. The mean growth rate of aneurysms in the 2.5-3.9 cm group was 2.2 mm in the first year, 2.8 mm in the second and 1.8 mm in the third. Corresponding growth rates in the 4.0-4.9 cm group were 2.7 mm, 4.2 mm and 2.2 mm. This study supports a policy of annual screening for aneurysms measuring 2.5-3.9 cm and 6-monthly screening for those > or = 4.0 cm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Cook (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: