Why the study?
Does an Activity-Sensing Rate-Responsive Pacemaker improve exercise capacity compared to conventional fixed-rate pacing in patients with complete atrioventricular block?
Does an Activity-Sensing Rate-Responsive Pacemaker improve exercise capacity compared to conventional fixed-rate pacing in patients with complete atrioventricular block?
Activity-sensing rate-responsive pacemakers significantly improve exercise tolerance and oxygen consumption compared to fixed-rate pacing in patients with complete atrioventricular block.
Rate-responsive pacing improves exercise capacity in complete AV block; confirms superiority over fixed-rate modes in this RCT.
The Activity-Sensing Rate-Responsive Pacemaker (RR-PM) varies the pacing rate in response to the level of physical activity.The effect of RR-PM was compared with that of conventional fixed-rate pacing (VVI-PM) on symptoms and exercise capacity (peak oxygen consumption and anaerobic threshold) during treadmill exercise in 6 patients between the ages of 38 and 75 years with complete atrioventricular block. A newly programmed treadmill exercise protocol was used for the measurement of anaerobic threshold.In the Rate-Responsive (RR) mode, the heart rate increased from 61±4 beats/min (bpm) to 103±12 bpm during maximal exercise ; the peak oxygen consumption and oxygen consumption at the anaerobic threshold significantly increased to a greater extent in RR mode than it did in fixed rate pacing mode. Thus, the use of RR-PM leads to better exercise tolerance than VVI-PM in complete atrioventricular block patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SHINMYO et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: