Key result
Clonidine used as an adjuvant in spinal anaesthesia showed no significant difference between the duration of sympathetic and motor blockade, suggesting simultaneous recovery of both functions.
Why the study?
Recovery from spinal anaesthesia is typically evaluated by motor recovery without considering autonomic blockade, which causes most complications; heart rate variability may assess autonomic recovery when clonidine is used as an adjuvant.
Does the addition of clonidine to bupivacaine alter heart rate variability at the time of motor function recovery in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia?
RCT (n=64)
Double-blind
Simple draw with envelopes
No
Does the addition of clonidine to bupivacaine alter heart rate variability at the time of motor function recovery in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia?
p-value: p=0.0124
The addition of clonidine to bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia does not significantly prolong sympathetic blockade compared to motor blockade recovery.
May simplify post-spinal monitoring of block resolution; leaves open confirmation in larger randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Spinal anaesthesia consists of administering a local anaesthetic in the subarachnoid space, thus causing sensory, motor, and autonomic nerve conduction block. Currently, recovery from spinal anaesthesia is evaluated by the return of motor function, without considering the autonomic blockade, which is responsible for most complications of the technique. Heart rate variability (HRV) is an indirect method to measure the autonomic nervous system and may be useful in assessing autonomic recovery after spinal anaesthesia. The study objective was to evaluate the autonomic function, through HRV, at the moment of return of motor function in patients who received spinal anaesthesia when clonidine is used as an adjuvant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind clinical trial. The sample consisted of 64 ASA I-II patients who underwent spinal anaesthesia and were divided into 2 groups. Group C received 20 mg of bupivacaine with 75 mcg of clonidine, and group B received 20 mg of bupivacaine. HRV was evaluated at rest (T1) and at the time of motor function recovery (T2). Data were collected using a Polar V800® heart rate monitor and then analysed and filtered using Kubios 3.0® software. RESULTS: There was no difference in the values of the low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio, Poincaré plot standard deviation (SD2/SD1), detrended fluctuation analysis (DFAα1, DFAα2), or correlation dimension (D2) indices in any of the groups between the 2 moments. In the clonidine group, there was a difference only in approximate entropy (ApEn), where a P of 0.0124 was obtained considering a 95% confidence interval ranging from 17.83 to 141.47. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the duration of sympathetic blockade and motor blockade in spinal anaesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batista et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Spinal anaesthesia (n=64). Clonidine vs. Bupivacaine alone was evaluated on Change in approximate entropy (ApEn) from rest to motor function recovery in the clonidine group (95% CI 17.83-141.47, p=0.0124). Clonidine used as an adjuvant in spinal anaesthesia showed no significant difference between the duration of sympathetic and motor blockade, suggesting simultaneous recovery of both functions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: