Key result
Wearable carotid Doppler ultrasound accurately detects stroke volume changes vs. TEE with up to ~0.95 AUROC.
Why the study?
A novel wireless wearable carotid Doppler ultrasound biosensor may serve as a functional hemodynamic monitor, but needed comparison against trans-esophageal echocardiography.
Does a wireless wearable carotid Doppler ultrasound patch accurately detect a ≥10% change in stroke volume compared to trans-esophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery?
Observational (n=2)
No
Does a wireless wearable carotid Doppler ultrasound patch accurately detect a ≥10% change in stroke volume compared to trans-esophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery?
This proof-of-principle study demonstrates that a hands-free wireless carotid Doppler patch can synchronously track stroke volume changes measured by TEE during cardiac surgery, especially when averaging 10 consecutive heartbeats.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports wearable carotid Doppler feasibility for perioperative stroke volume tracking; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: A novel, wireless, ultrasound biosensor that adheres to the neck and measures real-time Doppler of the carotid artery may be a useful functional hemodynamic monitor. A unique experimental set-up during elective coronary artery bypass surgery is described as a means to compare the wearable Doppler to trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods: A total of two representative patients were studied at baseline and during Trendelenburg position. Carotid Doppler spectra from the wearable ultrasound and TEE were synchronously captured. Areas under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) were performed to assess the accuracy of changing common carotid artery velocity time integral (ccVTI∆) at detecting a clinically significant change in stroke volume (SV∆). Results: Synchronously measuring and comparing Doppler spectra from the wearable ultrasound and TEE is feasible during Trendelenburg positioning. In two representative cardiac surgical patients, the ccVTI∆ accurately detected a clinically significant SV∆ with AUROCs of 0.89, 0.91, and 0.95 when single-beat, 3-consecutive beat and 10-consecutive beat averages were assessed, respectively. Conclusion: In this proof-of-principle research communication, a wearable Doppler ultrasound system is successfully compared to TEE. Preliminary data suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of carotid Doppler ultrasonography at detecting clinically significant SV∆ is enhanced by averaging more cardiac cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenny et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Elective coronary artery bypass surgery (n=2). Wireless wearable carotid Doppler ultrasound patch vs. Trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (AUROC) of changing common carotid artery velocity time integral (ccVTIΔ) at detecting a ≥10% change in stroke volume (SVΔ) measured by TEE (AUROC 0.89 (single-beat), 0.91 (3-beat), 0.95 (10-beat)). A wireless wearable carotid Doppler ultrasound detected clinically significant stroke volume changes (≥10%) with AUROCs of 0.89, 0.91, and 0.95 for 1-, 3-, and 10-beat averages compared to TEE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: