Key result
A novel index from a wireless Doppler ultrasound patch detected a 10% fall in aortic VTI with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
Early hemorrhage is often missed by traditional vital signs due to physiological reserve, especially in the young and healthy.
Does a novel index from a wireless Doppler ultrasound patch accurately detect decreasing cardiac output in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=8)
Does a novel index from a wireless Doppler ultrasound patch accurately detect decreasing cardiac output in healthy volunteers?
Effect estimate: 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity
A novel index derived from a wireless Doppler ultrasound patch can accurately detect acute decreases in cardiac output, potentially offering a more sensitive monitoring tool than standard vital signs.
May enable earlier non-invasive cardiac output monitoring than vital signs; leaves open validation in patients and clinical settings.
INTRODUCTION: Early hemorrhage is often missed by traditional vital signs because of physiological reserve, especially in the young and healthy. We have developed a novel, wearable, wireless Doppler ultrasound patch that tracks real-time blood velocity in the common carotid artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied eight healthy volunteers who decreased their cardiac output using a standardized Valsalva maneuver. In all eight, we simultaneously monitored the velocity time integral (VTI) of the common carotid artery (using the ultrasound patch) as well as the descending aorta (using a traditional pulsed wave duplex imaging system); the descending aortic VTI was used as a surrogate for left ventricular stroke volume (SV). Additionally, in a subset of four, we simultaneously measured SV using a noninvasive pulse contour analysis device. RESULTS: From baseline to peak effect of Valsalva, there was a statistically significant fall in descending aortic and common carotid VTI of 37% (P = 0.0005) and 23% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Both values returned to baseline on recovery. Additionally, a novel index from the carotid ultrasound patch (i.e., the heart rate divided by the carotid artery VTI) detected a 10% fall in aortic VTI with high sensitivity and specificity (100% and 100%, respectively); this novel index also accurately detected a 10% decrease in SV as measured by the noninvasive SV monitor. The mean arterial pressure, measured by the noninvasive pulse contour device, did not correctly detect the fall in SV. CONCLUSION: In summary, a novel index from a wireless Doppler ultrasound patch may be more sensitive and specific for detecting decreased cardiac output than standard vital signs in healthy volunteers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenny et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=8). Novel index from a wireless Doppler ultrasound patch (heart rate divided by carotid artery VTI) vs. Standard vital signs (mean arterial pressure) was evaluated on Detection of a 10% fall in aortic VTI (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity). A novel index from a wireless Doppler ultrasound patch detected a 10% fall in aortic VTI with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in healthy volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: