Key result
Ramipril did not significantly improve coronary flow velocity reserve compared to placebo (+0.34 vs +0.26, p=0.63) in normotensive women with microvascular angina.
Why the study?
Does ramipril improve coronary microvascular function (CFVR) and symptoms compared to placebo in normotensive women with microvascular angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction?
RCT (n=63)
Double-blind
1:1 allocation in blocks of 10
No
Does ramipril improve coronary microvascular function (CFVR) and symptoms compared to placebo in normotensive women with microvascular angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction?
In normotensive women with microvascular angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction, ramipril failed to improve coronary flow velocity reserve or angina symptoms compared with placebo, suggesting that previously reported benefits of ACE inhibition in microvascular angina may depend on blood pressure reduction.
Ramipril should not be used to improve microvascular function in normotensive women with angina; challenges prior ACEI benefits independent of BP reduction.
OBJECTIVE: Studies have suggested a beneficial effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. To explore whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril has a direct effect on the microvasculature beyond the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect, we investigated whether ramipril improved coronary microvascular function in normotensive women with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). METHODS: We included 63 normotensive women with angina, no epicardial stenosis>50% and CMD defined as a coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR)<2.2 assessed by adenosine stress-echocardiography in a randomized double-blinded, superiority trial with 1:1 allocation to placebo or ramipril (maximum dose 10 mg depending on blood pressure) for 24±6 weeks. Primary outcome was CFVR. Secondary outcomes were left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and symptoms evaluated by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02525081). RESULTS: Follow-up was available on 55 patients. BP remained unchanged during treatment in both groups. CFVR improved in both the ramipril (p = 0.004) and placebo group (p = 0.026) with no difference between groups (p = 0.63). Symptoms improved in both groups with no significant between-group differences. No changes were detected in parameters of systolic and diastolic function. No serious adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In normotensive women with angina and CMD, treatment with ramipril had no significant effect on CFVR or symptoms compared with placebo. The effect of ACE inhibition previously reported may be mediated by blood pressure reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michelsen et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and microvascular angina in normotensive women (n=63). Ramipril vs. Matching placebo was evaluated on Change in coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) assessed by adenosine stress transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (p=0.63). Ramipril did not significantly improve coronary flow velocity reserve compared to placebo (+0.34 vs +0.26, p=0.63) in normotensive women with microvascular angina.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: