Key result
ARNi initiation does not significantly alter circulating PENK or pro-SP levels in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Because neprilysin degrades many substrates, the specific therapeutic mechanism of neprilysin inhibition with ARNi in HFrEF remains not entirely evident.
Does initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (ARNi) alter circulating levels of the neprilysin substrate surrogates proenkephalin-A 119-159 (PENK) and pro-substance P (pro-SP) in patients with stable HFrEF?
Cohort (n=141)
Blinded biomarker assay measurement
No
Does initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (ARNi) alter circulating levels of the neprilysin substrate surrogates proenkephalin-A 119-159 (PENK) and pro-substance P (pro-SP) in patients with stable HFrEF?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan does not induce sustained long-term changes in circulating proenkephalin-A 119-159 or pro-substance P in HFrEF patients, suggesting the clinical benefits of ARNi are not reflected by alterations in these stable precursor biomarkers.
Aims As NEP degrades many substrates, the specific therapeutic mechanism of NEP inhibition with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is not entirely evident. The aim of this study was to investigate the response of two substrates of NEP—the tachykinin and enkephalin systems—to the initiation of ARNi therapy in HFrEF. Methods and results Between 2016 and 2018, 141 consecutive patients with stable HFrEF [74 with initiation of ARNi and 67 controls on continuous angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy] were prospectively enrolled. Plasma proenkephalin-A 119-159 (PENK) and pro-substance P (pro-SP) were serially determined. Proenkephalin-A 119-159 and pro-SP correlated strongly with each other (rs = 0.67, P < 0.001) and kidney function (rs = −0.66, P < 0.001 and rs = −0.54, P < 0.001) and modestly with NT-proBNP (rs = 0.32, P < 0.001 and rs = 0.24, P = 0.006, respectively). Concentrations of circulating PENK were slightly elevated after 1 and 2 year follow-up compared with baseline (BL) [BL median: 67.4 pmol/L (IQR: 57.3–89.8), 1 year: 83.5 pmol/L (IQR: 62.4–111.6), 2 years: 92.3 pmol/L (IQR: 63.1–101.9); BL vs. 1 year: P = 0.017 and BL vs. 2 years: P = 0.019] in the overall analysis, but lost significance at 2 year follow-up when assessed in paired subanalysis (P = 0.116). Plasma pro-SP levels remained comparable during the entire follow-up [BL median: 78.3 pmol/L (IQR: 67.9–90.6), 1 year: 75.9 pmol/L (IQR: 58.6–96.3), 2 years: 79.7 pmol/L (IQR: 59.9–105.3); P = ns for both timepoints]. Biomarker patterns of ARNi patients were independent from baseline therapy, that is, ACEi or ARB (P > 0.05 between groups). Conclusions Although enkephalins and SP are known substrates of NEP, NEP inhibition by ARNi does not clearly affect the circulating precursors PENK and pro-SP in HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arfsten et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Stable heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=141). Sacubitril/valsartan (ARNi) therapy initiation vs. Continuous ACEi or ARB therapy was evaluated on Plasma concentrations of proenkephalin-A 119-159 (PENK) and pro-substance P (pro-SP) at 1- and 2-year follow-up (p=0.116 (paired 2-year PENK); ns (pro-SP)).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: