Key result
Ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI ≥0.55) predicted albuminuria progression (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.02-1.83), but lost independent predictive value after adjusting for 24-h pulse pressure.
Why the study?
Does ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) or 24-h pulse pressure better predict the progression of albuminuria in older patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=1,043)
Does ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) or 24-h pulse pressure better predict the progression of albuminuria in older patients with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.37 (95% CI 1.02–1.83)
Ambulatory 24-h pulse pressure outperforms the ambulatory arterial stiffness index in predicting the progression of albuminuria in older patients with type 2 diabetes.
24-h pulse pressure may outperform AASI for albuminuria progression risk in older type 2 diabetes; leaves open its value for risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory 24-h pulse pressure predicts progression of albuminuria in people with diabetes mellitus. It is not known whether the ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) may add to that prediction. METHODS: We compared the multivariate-adjusted association of AASI and 24-h pulse pressure with progression of urine albumin excretion during follow-up in a multiethnic cohort of older people with type-2 diabetes mellitus. The baseline evaluation included office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements, and a spot urine measurement of albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). The ACR measurements were repeated annually during 3 years. RESULTS: The AASI was >or=0.55 units in 47% of those exhibiting progression of albuminuria, and in 37% of those without progression (P = .004), whereas 24-h pulse pressure was >or=65 mm Hg in 50% and 38% of those with and without progression, respectively (P = .001). In repeated measures mixed linear model (n = 1043), after adjustment for several covariates including office pulse pressure, AASI in the fourth quartile was independently associated with higher follow-up ACR (P = .024). However, that association did not persist after adjusting for 24-h pulse pressure, which was an independent predictor (P < .001). Cox proportional hazards models examined progression of albuminuria in 957 participants without macroalbuminuria at baseline. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for AASI >or=0.55 units was 1.37 (1.02-1.83) after multivariable adjustment, including office pulse pressure. But AASI was not an independent predictor after adjustment for ambulatory pulse pressure, which was again an independent predictor (P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory 24-h pulse pressure outperformed AASI in predicting progression of albuminuria in elderly people with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palmas et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Type-2 diabetes mellitus (n=1,043). Ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) and 24-h pulse pressure vs. Lower AASI and 24-h pulse pressure was evaluated on Progression of albuminuria (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.83). Ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI ≥0.55) predicted albuminuria progression (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.02-1.83), but lost independent predictive value after adjusting for 24-h pulse pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: