Key result
The Hilbert Double Envelope Method achieved a peak detection sensitivity of 99.45% for PPG signals and 99.07% for ECG signals, demonstrating PPG as a suitable alternative to ECG for HRV extraction.
Why the study?
There is no consensus regarding whether photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals can adequately replace electrocardiogram (ECG) signals for heart rate variability estimation.
Is PPG a suitable alternative to ECG for HRV feature extraction using various peak detection algorithms?
Observational (n=40)
Is PPG a suitable alternative to ECG for HRV feature extraction using various peak detection algorithms?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PPG is a suitable alternative to ECG for HRV feature extraction, particularly when using the Hilbert Double Envelope Method for peak detection.
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) evaluates the autonomic nervous system regulation and can be used as a monitoring tool in conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, neuropathies and sleep staging. It can be extracted from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals. Typically, the HRV is obtained from the ECG processing. Being the PPG sensor widely used in clinical setups for physiological parameters monitoring such as blood oxygenation and ventilatory rate, the question arises regarding the PPG adequacy for HRV extraction. There is not a consensus regarding the PPG being able to replace the ECG in the HRV estimation. This work aims to be a contribution to this research area by comparing the HRV estimation obtained from simultaneously acquired ECG and PPG signals from forty subjects. A peak detection method is herein introduced based on the Hilbert transform: Hilbert Double Envelope Method (HDEM). Two other peak detector methods were also evaluated: Pan-Tompkins and Wavelet-based. HRV parameters for time, frequency and the non-linear domain were calculated for each algorithm and the Pearson correlation, T-test and RMSE were evaluated. The HDEM algorithm showed the best overall results with a sensitivity of 99.07% and 99.45% for the ECG and the PPG signals, respectively. For this algorithm, a high correlation and no significant differences were found between HRV features and the gold standard, for the ECG and PPG signals. The results show that the PPG is a suitable alternative to the ECG for HRV feature extraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esgalhado et al. (2022) reported an observational. Photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals vs. Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals was evaluated on Peak detection sensitivity using the HDEM algorithm. The Hilbert Double Envelope Method achieved a peak detection sensitivity of 99.45% for PPG signals and 99.07% for ECG signals, demonstrating PPG as a suitable alternative to ECG for HRV extraction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: