Key result
Heart rate variability parameters extracted from smartphone photoplethysmograms were highly correlated with those derived from standard ECG (r > 0.7, P < 0.001).
Why the study?
Can heart rate variability be accurately extracted from smartphone photoplethysmograms compared to standard ECG in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=30)
Can heart rate variability be accurately extracted from smartphone photoplethysmograms compared to standard ECG in healthy subjects?
Smartphone camera-derived photoplethysmograms can accurately measure several heart rate variability parameters, offering a potential accessible alternative to traditional ECG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support accessible smartphone HRV assessment in healthy subjects; leaves open validation in patients and prospective outcomes.
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a useful clinical tool for autonomic function assessment and cardiovascular diseases diagnosis. It is traditionally calculated from a dedicated medical electrocardiograph (ECG). In this paper, we demonstrate that HRV can also be extracted from photoplethysmograms (PPG) obtained by the camera of a smartphone. Sixteen HRV parameters, including time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear parameters, were calculated from PPG captured by a smartphone for 30 healthy subjects and were compared with those derived from ECG. The statistical results showed that 14 parameters (AVNN, SDNN, CV, RMSSD, SDSD, TP, VLF, LF, HF, LF/HF, nLF, nHF, SD1, and SD2) from PPG were highly correlated (r > 0.7, P < 0.001) with those from ECG, and 7 parameters (AVNN, TP, VLF, LF, HF, nLF, and nHF) from PPG were in good agreement with those from ECG within the acceptable limits. In addition, five different algorithms to detect the characteristic points of PPG wave were also investigated: peak point (PP), valley point (VP), maximum first derivative (M1D), maximum second derivative (M2D), and tangent intersection (TI). The results showed that M2D and TI algorithms had the best performance. These results suggest that the smartphone might be used for HRV measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=30). Smartphone photoplethysmograms (PPG) vs. Medical electrocardiograph (ECG) was evaluated on Correlation of 16 HRV parameters between PPG and ECG (r > 0.7, p=< 0.001). Heart rate variability parameters extracted from smartphone photoplethysmograms were highly correlated with those derived from standard ECG (r > 0.7, P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: