Key result
Smartphone-based photoplethysmography showed good agreement with ECG for measuring HRV indices (NN, SDNN, RMSSD) with a standard deviation of error around 5.4 ms, but insufficient for LF/HF.
Why the study?
Does smartphone-based photoplethysmography accurately measure heart rate variability compared to ECG in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=23)
Does smartphone-based photoplethysmography accurately measure heart rate variability compared to ECG in healthy subjects?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Smartphone-based photoplethysmography can accurately measure time-domain heart rate variability indices (NN, SDNN, RMSSD) but is insufficient for frequency-domain (LF/HF) analysis.
A measurement method of heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) based on smartphone has been developed and validated. The method is based on photoplethysmography (PPG) acquired with the smartphone camera (SPPG). SPPG was compared with the electrocardiogram (ECG), used as the gold standard, and with an external PPG sensor. Twenty-three healthy subjects were measured using two different smartphone models in three different breathing conditions. The error of the first differentiation between SPPG and ECG series is minimized with the fiducial point at maximum first derivative of the SPPG. The obtained standard deviation of error (SDE) between SPPG and ECG is around 5.4 ms and it is similar to SDE between PPG and ECG. Good agreement between SPPG and ECG for NN, SDNN and RMSSD have been found but it is insufficient agreement for LF/HF. Similar levels of agreement for SPPG-ECG and PPG-ECG have been obtained for the HRV indices. Finally, the differences between smartphone models for HRV indices are slight. Therefore, the smartphone can be used for measuring accurately the following HRV indices: NN, SDNN and RMSSD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guede-Fernández et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=23). Smartphone-based photoplethysmography (SPPG) vs. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated on Standard deviation of error (SDE) between SPPG and ECG (SDE 5.4 ms). Smartphone-based photoplethysmography showed good agreement with ECG for measuring HRV indices (NN, SDNN, RMSSD) with a standard deviation of error around 5.4 ms, but insufficient for LF/HF.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: