Heart rate variability (HRV) is a valuable tool for assessing autonomic function and diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. Electrocardiography (ECG) is considered the gold standard for HRV measurements. Photoplethysmography (PPG), a simpler and more convenient method has emerged as an alternative to ECG for HRV measurement. As a result of this technique, many mobile applications have been developed that claim to perform real-time HRV in short periods ranging from 10 seconds to 1 minute. However, HRV requires at least 5-mintues for accurate measurements. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the validity of short-term (5 min) and ultra-short-term (<5 min) HRV measurements obtained through a commercially available smartphone app (Camera Heart Rate Variability app) and compared to a traditional PPG sensor (Shimmer3 GSR+). PPG signals were collected from 16 healthy participants and pre-processed to eliminate noise and reduce motion artifacts. A total of 12 HRV features were then extracted using time-domain analysis (TA) and frequency-domain analysis (FA). Next, HRV features were compared using correlation analysis. TA features using Camera HRV app (meanHR, AVNN, RMSDD, pNN50) showed significant correlation (r > 0.7) at a minimum duration of 0.5-minute, while SDNN required 1 minute. FA features (VLF, LF, LFnu, HFnu) required a minimum duration of 2 minute, while (HF, LF/HF, TP) required 3 minutes. In conclusion, Camera HRV app is suggested to be a valid surrogate to traditional PPG sensors and has the potential to be used in various fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alali et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: