Key result
Elite HRV and Welltory smartphone apps match ECG for measuring HRV in elite cyclists.
Why the study?
Wearable smartphone applications can measure heart rate variability, but their validity and reliability for short and ultra-short measurements in elite athletes needed evaluation.
Do smartphone applications accurately and reliably measure HRV compared to standard ECG in professional cyclists?
Cross-Sectional (n=26)
Do smartphone applications accurately and reliably measure HRV compared to standard ECG in professional cyclists?
Smartphone applications using chest straps or photoplethysmography provide valid and reliable short and ultra-short HRV measurements in elite athletes compared to standard ECG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Smartphone apps may validly measure HRV in elite cyclists; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Heart rate variability (HRV) has been proposed as a useful marker that can show the performance adaptation and optimize the training process in elite athletes. The development of wearable technology permits the measurement of this marker through smartphone applications. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of short and ultra-short HRV measurements in elite cyclists using different smartphone applications. METHOD: Twenty-six professional cyclists were measured at rest in supine and in seated positions through the simultaneous use of an electrocardiogram and two different smartphone applications that implement different technologies to measure HRV: Elite HRV (with a chest strap) and Welltory (photoplethysmography). Level of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Compared to an electrocardiogram, Elite HRV and Welltory showed no differences neither in supine nor in seated positions (p > 0.05) and they showed very strong to almost perfect correlation levels (r = 0.77 to 0.94). Furthermore, no differences were found between short (5 min) and ultra-short (1 min) length measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient showed good to excellent reliability and the standard error of measurement remained lower than 6%. CONCLUSION: Both smartphone applications can be implemented to monitor HRV using short- and ultra-short length measurements in elite endurance athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moya‐Ramón et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Elite cyclists (n=26). Smartphone applications (Elite HRV and Welltory) vs. Electrocardiogram was evaluated on Validity and reliability of HRV measurements (r = 0.77 to 0.94, p=> 0.05). Smartphone applications Elite HRV and Welltory showed no differences compared to electrocardiogram for measuring HRV in elite cyclists (p > 0.05), with very strong correlation (r = 0.77 to 0.94).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: