Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of heart rate variability measurements obtained with a new mobile app (Selftraining UMH) across two resting conditions.
Does the Selftraining UMH app provide valid and reliable HRV measurements compared to an ECG in healthy people?
Does the Selftraining UMH app provide valid and reliable HRV measurements compared to an ECG in healthy people?
The Selftraining UMH smartphone app, paired with a Polar H10 chest strap, provides valid and reliable HRV measurements comparable to an ECG in healthy individuals.
Mobile app HRV may aid daily training decisions in healthy adults; leaves open validation for clinical cardiovascular use.
Heart rate variability (HRV) has allowed the implementation of a methodology for daily decision making called day-to-day training, which allows data to be recorded by anyone with a smartphone. The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the validity and reliability of HRV measurements with a new mobile app (Selftraining UMH) in two resting conditions. Twenty healthy people (10 male and 10 female) were measured at rest in supine and seated positions with an electrocardiogram and an application for smartphones at the same time (Selftraining UMH) using recordings obtained through an already validated chest-worn heart rate monitor (Polar H10). The Selftraining UMH app showed no significant differences compared to an electrocardiogram, neither in supine nor in sitting position (p > 0.05) and they presented almost perfect correlation levels (r ≥ 0.99). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between ultra-short (1-min) and short (5-min) length measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed excellent reliability (>0.90) and the standard error of measurement remained below 5%. The Selftraining UMH smartphone app connected via Bluetooth to the Polar H10 chest strap can be used to register daily HRV recordings in healthy sedentary people.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casanova‐Lizón et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: