Key result
Heart rate variability parameters measured using a rear smartphone camera were highly correlated with traditional ECG measurements (all r > 0.95, p < 0.05), demonstrating its feasibility as a convenient assessment tool.
Why the study?
Heart rate variability is the preferred method for assessing autonomic nervous system function, but traditional detection requires an ECG or photoelectric sensor.
Does a rear smartphone camera accurately measure heart rate variability compared to standard ECG in healthy college students?
Cross-Sectional (n=24)
No
Does a rear smartphone camera accurately measure heart rate variability compared to standard ECG in healthy college students?
Effect estimate: r = 0.994
p-value: p=<0.001
A rear smartphone camera can accurately measure heart rate variability parameters compared to standard ECG in healthy individuals, offering a convenient tool for autonomic nervous system assessment.
Smartphone camera HRV may enable convenient ANS assessment; leaves open validation in clinical populations.
The measurement of heart rate variability (HRV) is the preferred method for assessing the function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Traditional HRV detection requires an electrocardiogram (ECG) or photoelectric sensor. In this paper, we propose a new method for HRV measurement using a rear smartphone camera as a sensor. Video signals from the fingertips of 24 college students were acquired using the rear camera of an HTC M8d smartphone. ECG signals were simultaneously recorded as reference. The video signals were converted into single-frame image sequences over time. Each image frame was transformed into point data through superpositioning of pixel color attribute values and averaging according to space. The point data were sorted by time to obtain a photoplethysmogram (PPG). Finally, the Hilbert transform was used to extract the pulse-to-pulse interval and the R-to-R interval for the PPG and ECG, respectively. Sixteen HRV parameters (mean HR, max HR, min HR, SDNN, RMSSD, NN50, pNN50, VLF, LF, HF, TP, LFnu, HFnu, LF/HF, SD1, and SD2) were analyzed. All 16 HRV parameters were highly correlated (all rs > 0.95, ps <; 0.05), and the effect size (ES) differences were small (ES <; 0.175) for all indices except for RMSSD, HF, and SD1. Compared with the ECG method, the errors of the 13 HRV parameters measured using this method were within acceptable ranges. The results suggest that this technique can be used as a convenient method to assess and quantify ANS activity and balance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=24). Rear smartphone camera (contact video PPG) vs. Micro-ECG recorder was evaluated on Correlation between pulse-to-pulse intervals (PPI) from smartphone and R-to-R intervals (RRI) from ECG (r = 0.994, p=<0.001). Heart rate variability parameters measured using a rear smartphone camera were highly correlated with traditional ECG measurements (all r > 0.95, p < 0.05), demonstrating its feasibility as a convenient assessment tool.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: