Key result
Several tools and laboratory tests, including the SCAI stage, ORBI score, vasoactive inotropic score, serum calcium, ALT, lactate, and NPAR, can help clinicians prognosticate outcomes and predict mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.
This review highlights key clinical metrics, scoring systems, and laboratory tests that can help predict mortality and guide early intervention in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) can be defined as a range of illnesses that describes a state where cardiac output, which is the blood volume ejected from the left ventricle every minute that leads to tissue perfusion of nutrients, is insufficient in providing adequate oxygenation to the systemic circulation. The incidence of CS on admission has increased in recent years, with the six- and 12-month mortality rates remaining unchanged. The purpose of this literature review is to bring forth several parameters that have been utilized in the past 10 years to predict CS mortality. Further studies to implement these parameters in management algorithms, along with early screenings and advanced treatment options such as mechanical cardiac assist devices, can improve the mortality associated with CS. This literature-based review was conducted by evaluating current research focusing on the clinical presentation of CS and predictors of CS. PubMed served as the primary database for article retrieval due to access. Two searches were conducted: One for clinical presentations and advanced metrics for CS and another for early predictors for CS. Thirteen articles regarding clinical presentation and seven articles regarding early predictors were selected. Three tools/scores and five laboratory tests were identified that allowed clinicians to prognosticate outcomes in patients suffering from CS based on clinical and laboratory presentations. Examining these predictors will allow earlier intervention in the development of CS and potentially help lower the mortality rate of CS. The eventual creation of a scoring system that incorporates multiple metrics discussed in this review can provide the most accurate prognosis of CS, which can lead to more targeted interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cardiogenic shock. Early predictors and advanced metrics was evaluated. Several tools and laboratory tests, including the SCAI stage, ORBI score, vasoactive inotropic score, serum calcium, ALT, lactate, and NPAR, can help clinicians prognosticate outcomes and predict mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: