Key result
The ACE I/D polymorphism was not significantly associated with type 2 diabetes risk in a Chinese population (DD vs. II: OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.97-1.42).
Why the study?
Is the ACE I/D polymorphism associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in a Chinese population?
Meta-Analysis (n=10,076)
Is the ACE I/D polymorphism associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in a Chinese population?
Odds Ratio: 1.17 (95% CI 0.97–1.42)
The ACE I/D polymorphism does not appear to be significantly associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in the Chinese population.
No association with T2D risk in Chinese; leaves open other genetic or ethnic factors for future study.
OBJECTIVE: A role for the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been suggested in the aetiology of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, results have been inconsistent. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to further clarify the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM risk in a Chinese population. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Wan Fang Data were searched for eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model or random-effects model. RESULTS: : A total of 41 studies (4708 cases and 5368 controls) for the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM in a Chinese population were identified. The pooled ORs for the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM risk were not statistically significant under all genetic models (co-dominant model: DD vs. II: OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.42 and ID vs. II: OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.10; dominant model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19; multiplicative model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.18). Although a marginally significant association was observed under a recessive model (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), robustness of this estimate could not be established under additional sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: : The meta-analysis presented in this study indicated that ACE I/D polymorphism may not be associated with the risk of T2DM in the Chinese population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes (n=10,076). ACE I/D polymorphism vs. II genotype was evaluated on Type 2 diabetes risk (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.42). The ACE I/D polymorphism was not significantly associated with type 2 diabetes risk in a Chinese population (DD vs. II: OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.97-1.42).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: