Key result
Rescue simulation and maximal exercise both transiently reduce femoral PWV without altering central arterial stiffness.
Why the study?
It was unclear how hemodynamic responses following clinical exercise testing compare to those after firefighting tasks in personal protective equipment.
Does a simulated fire rescue operation produce different acute arterial stiffness and hemodynamic responses compared to a maximal aerobic exercise test in professional firefighters?
Does a simulated fire rescue operation produce different acute arterial stiffness and hemodynamic responses compared to a maximal aerobic exercise test in professional firefighters?
Hemodynamic and arterial stiffness responses are largely similar between clinical maximal exercise testing and simulated fire rescue operations in young fit firefighters, supporting maximal exercise testing as a viable clinical screening tool for occupational cardiovascular strain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparable femoral PWV reductions after rescue simulation and exercise; leaves open validation of testing as occupational strain screen.
Cardiovascular events are the leading cause of on-duty deaths among firefighters. Screening firefighters for risk of sudden cardiac event is a critical element of a comprehensive medical program. Although intense physical exertion has been shown to trigger sudden cardiac events in the general population, it is unclear how hemodynamic responses following clinical exercise testing compare to that of performing firefighting tasks in personal protective equipment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare hemodynamic responses following rescue simulation (RS) and maximal exercise in firefighters. This was a cross-over repeated measures study. Thirty-eight professional firefighters (31.8 ± 5.2 yr; VO2peak: 57.9 mL/kg/min) completed a maximal aerobic exercise test (MAET) and an RS. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), pulse pressure (PP), and brachial and central mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured before and 5 and 15 min post-exercise. The findings indicated that femoral PWV decreased after MAET and RS at both time points (p < 0.005). No significant differences were found in aortic and carotid PWV over time or between conditions (p ≥ 0.05). Significant increases in brachial and central PP and MAP were noted 5 min post-MAET and RS (p = 0.004). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that peripheral arterial stiffness (AS) decreased in firefighters following both conditions, with no differences in central AS. Our findings provide valuable information on hemodynamic responses similar between RS and MAET, and are important for controlling CVD risk and the AS response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2023) studied Cardiovascular and hemodynamic responses to strenuous exertion in professional firefighters (n=38). Rescue simulation (RS) in personal protective equipment and self-contained breathing apparatus vs. Maximal aerobic exercise test (MAET) on a treadmill was evaluated on Femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) at 5 and 15 minutes post-activity (η2 = 0.30 (RS), η2 = 0.20 (MAET), p=<0.005). Rescue simulation and maximal aerobic exercise both decreased femoral pulse wave velocity at 5 and 15 minutes post-activity without altering central arterial stiffness.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: