Key result
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for cardiac sarcoidosis, with an overall sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.97) and specificity of 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-0.94).
Why the study?
The diagnostic efficacy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare guidelines for cardiac sarcoidosis remained to be elucidated.
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis compared to JMHW guidelines in suspected patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=649)
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis compared to JMHW guidelines in suspected patients?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.97)
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for cardiac sarcoidosis, supporting its use as an effective screening and diagnostic tool.
CMR may aid noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis; leaves open validation in prospective cohorts before routine adoption.
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an effective technique for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). The efficacy of CMR versus the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) guidelines considered as standard criterion for the diagnosis of CS remains to be elucidated. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed at assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CMR in cardiac sarcoidosis. We searched on PubMed from January 1, 1980, to March 28, 2018, on Embase from January 1, 1980, to March 29, 2018, and on the Cochrane Library from January 1, 1980, to April 1, 2018, using a strategy based on the search terms (sarcoidosis and magnetic resonance imaging) independently. We analyzed the data obtained with Revman 5.3 and Stata 14.0 software. Results: Eight studies with a total of 649 participants met the inclusion criteria, and data were extracted. CMR had an overall sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.97) and specificity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-0.94) for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97). The subgroup analysis via public year showed that studies between 2011 and 2017 had an overall sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.49-0.99), with an area under the SROC curve being 0.96. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that CMR could be used for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis and screening of patients suspected of CS. With the improvement of the technique, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI has improved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiac sarcoidosis (n=649). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) vs. Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) guidelines was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for cardiac sarcoidosis (Sensitivity 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.97). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for cardiac sarcoidosis, with an overall sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.97) and specificity of 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-0.94).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: