Key result
In Korean children with acute watery diarrhea, viral coinfection occurred in 18.1% of cases, with rotavirus and norovirus being the most common combination (12.9%).
Cross-Sectional (n=155)
No
Rotavirus and norovirus are the most common viral agents responsible for acute watery diarrhea and coinfection in Korean children.
Highlights coinfection burden in Korean pediatric diarrhea; supports prospective studies on clinical impact before changing testing practices.
Currently, there are a few reports on viral coinfection that causes an acute watery diarrhea in Korean children. So, to evaluate the features of coinfectious viral agents in children with acute watery diarrhea, we enrolled 155 children with acute watery diarrhea from July 2005 to June 2006. Fecal samples were collected and evaluated for various viral infections such as rotavirus, norovirus, adenovirus and astrovirus. The mean (+/-standard deviation) age of the children was 2.71+/-2.37 yr. The detection rate of viral agents was most common in children between the ages of 1 and 3 yr. Rotavirus was detected in 63 children (41.3%), norovirus in 56 (36.2%), adenovirus in 11 (7.1%), and astrovirus in 1 (0.6%). Regarding rotavirus, there were 38 (60.3%) cases with monoinfection and 25 (39.7%) with coinfection. For norovirus, there were 33 (58.9%) cases with monoinfection and 23 (41.1%) with coinfection. Coinfection with rotavirus and norovirus was most common, and occurred in 20/155 cases (12.9%) including coinfection with adenovirus. So, rotavirus and norovirus were the most common coinfectious viral agents in our study population with acute watery diarrhea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koh et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute watery diarrhea (n=155). Viral coinfection vs. Monoinfection or no infection was evaluated on Incidence of viral coinfection. In Korean children with acute watery diarrhea, viral coinfection occurred in 18.1% of cases, with rotavirus and norovirus being the most common combination (12.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: