Key result
Provider interaction with best practice advisory notifications increased the odds of appropriate abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
Why the study?
The impact of electronic medical record best practice advisory notifications on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening rates in eligible patients was unknown.
Does interacting with best practice advisory (BPA) notifications improve abdominal aortic aneurysm screening rates in male patients aged 65 to 75 years with a smoking history?
Observational (n=1,205)
No
Does interacting with best practice advisory (BPA) notifications improve abdominal aortic aneurysm screening rates in male patients aged 65 to 75 years with a smoking history?
Provider interaction with electronic medical record best practice advisories significantly increases the likelihood of appropriate abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Engaging BPA alerts was associated with higher AAA screening odds; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
Objective Best practice advisory notifications (BPAs) have become an integral part of many electronic medical record (EMR) systems. These communications alert providers to recommended therapy or screenings for patients depending on factors found within the EMR. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of BPAs on the rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in patients who met guidelines for screening in a single-center EMR. Methods We reviewed all patients who triggered a BPA alert for AAA screening from December 2018 to December 2021 in a single tertiary academic setting. The BPA alerts the provider when closing the chart when a patient meets the criteria for AAA screening based on the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations of screening male patients aged 65 to 75 years with a smoking history. Provider responses to these triggers were analyzed, and the predictors of response to the advisory and its impact on AAA screening for individual patients within 6 months of the alert was evaluated. Results Over this period, 1292 patients triggered the BPA for AAA screening. After excluding deceased patients, 1205 patients were included in the final analysis. Providers interacted with rather than dismissed the BPA in 20.4% of patients. The overall screening rate in this patient cohort was 28.28%. Interacting with the BPA significantly increased the odds of being appropriately screened for a AAA (odds ratio, 2.48). A higher number of visits and BPA triggers correlated with increased odds of undergoing screening for AAA (odds ratios, 1.08 and 1.02, respectively). Additionally, patients who underwent screening were younger in age and more often African American as compared with other races. The presence and number of comorbid conditions were not associated with screening rates, although hyperlipidemia was associated with positive response to BPA. Conclusions The overall rate of appropriate AAA screening is low, despite the presence of BPAs. Positively interacting with rather than dismissing the BPA is correlated with an increased rate of appropriate AAA screening. Providers were more likely to screen patients if the patient was younger, had more health care system visits, or if the trigger was delivered more often to members of the health care team. Further study is needed to evaluate provider factors that will result in an increased adherence to recommended screening guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinkney et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening eligibility (n=1,205). Interacting with best practice advisory (BPA) notifications vs. Dismissing the BPA was evaluated on Appropriately screened for a AAA within 6 months (OR 2.48). Provider interaction with best practice advisory notifications increased the odds of appropriate abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: