Why the study?
Segment-specific variations of CIMT had not been assessed in South Asian populations, leaving unclear whether segment-specific CIMTs or a composite-CIMT score is a better risk predictor of coronary heart disease.
Does a composite-CIMT score better predict coronary heart disease compared to segment-specific CIMTs in a South Asian population?
Case-Control (n=694)
No
Does a composite-CIMT score better predict coronary heart disease compared to segment-specific CIMTs in a South Asian population?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.926
A composite carotid intima-media thickness score demonstrated high sensitivity and good diagnostic accuracy for predicting coronary heart disease in a South Asian population.
Composite CIMT score may aid CHD prediction in South Asians; leaves open validation against standard risk models before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Segment-specific variations of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) have not been assessed in South Asian populations. The purpose of this study was to determine if segment-specific CIMTs or a composite-CIMT score is a better risk predictor of coronary heart disease in South Asian populations. METHODS: A comparative prospective study was conducted from November 2019 to October 2020 in a hospital in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, cases (having a diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), n = 338) and controls (non-CHD group, n = 356) were recruited. Ultrasound examination of the common carotid (CCA), the carotid bulb (CB) and the internal carotid segments (ICA) of the carotid vessels was conducted by a radiologist, and CIMTs were measured. A composite-CIMT score defined as the average value of all six segments of the left and right sides was derived. RESULTS: 694 participants were enrolled (male n = 399, 57.5%). The mean (±SD) age of the study sample was 60.2 (±9.86) years. There were variations in segment-specific values between the left and right vessels. The mean composite-CIMT value of the CHD group was significantly higher than that of the non-CHD group. A composite-CIMT score of 0.758 had a sensitivity of 98.4% and a specificity of 64.6% in distinguishing CHD from non-CHD groups (Area under the curve (AUC): 0.926). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery segment-specific CIMT variations were present in this population. The composite CIMT score is better than segment-specific CIMTs in predicting CHD and may be used to predict CHD in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abeysuriya et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in Coronary Heart Disease (n=694). Composite carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) score vs. Non-CHD group was evaluated on Distinguishing CHD from non-CHD groups (AUC 0.926).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: