Why the study?
Does multisite ventricular pacing improve left ventricular electromechanical delay in patients with drug-resistant primitive dilated cardiomyopathy and QRS >= 140 ms?
Does multisite ventricular pacing improve left ventricular electromechanical delay in patients with drug-resistant primitive dilated cardiomyopathy and QRS >= 140 ms?
Biventricular and left ventricular pacing improve left ventricular electromechanical synchronization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and prolonged QRS.
BVP/LVP may improve LV electromechanical synchronization in wide-QRS DCM; hypothesis-generating pending randomized outcome trials.
UNLABELLED: We sought to assess right, left and biventricular pacing effects on myocardial function by using pulsed-Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) and automated border detection (ABD) techniques which provide electromechanical delay (EMD) assessment of the different left ventricular walls. METHODS: 15 patients (67+/-7 years) with drug-resistant primitive dilated cardiomyopathy and QRS> or =140 ms received a pacemaker for multisite ventricular pacing. Echocardiography was performed after 1 month of biventricular pacing (BVP). Echocardiographic measurements were recorded during spontaneous rhythm (SpR), right ventricular pacing (RVP), left ventricular pacing (LVP) and BVP. RESULTS: LV ejection fraction was statistically similar between the four rhythms. BVP showed a significant EMD decrease for the lateral LV wall vs. SpR, RVP and even LVP. LVP resulted in significantly longer aortic pre-ejection time vs. BVP while the EMD temporal dispersion (time between the shortest regional EMD and the longest one) was similar in the two modes. CONCLUSIONS: BVP and LVP substantially reduce the EMD temporal dispersion of the four LV walls, but with a longer aortic pre-ejection time for LVP. In RVP, LVP and BVP, the septal LV wall is always activated later than during SpR. BVP and LVP are associated with a mitral regurgitation reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lafitte et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: