Why the study?
Does real-time MRI guidance improve the diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy in an animal model of focal myocardial pathology?
Does real-time MRI guidance improve the diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy in an animal model of focal myocardial pathology?
Real-time MRI guidance significantly improves the diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy compared to standard X-ray fluoroscopy in an animal model of focal myocardial pathology.
MRI-guided targeted biopsy may raise yield in focal myocardial disease; leaves open human translation and clinical validation.
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy is low, particularly in disease that affects the myocardium in a non-uniform distribution. We hypothesized that real-time MRI guidance could improve the yield through targeted biopsy of focal myocardial pathology. METHODS: An animal model of focal myocardial pathology was created by infusing 3mL of fluorescent microspheres (NuFlow Hydrocoat, 15μm diameter, 5 million spheres/mL) followed by 2mL of 100% ethanol to a branch coronary artery. Animals were survived for minimum 14days, before undergoing MRI guided endomyocardial biopsy using a custom 6.5Fr active visualization MRI-conditional bioptome and X-ray guided biopsy using a commercial bioptome. Specimens were analyzed using a dissecting microscope under ultraviolet light to determine the proportion of 'on-target' specimens containing fluorescent microspheres. RESULTS: A total of 77 specimens were obtained using real-time MRI guidance and 87 using X-ray guidance, in five animals. Specimens obtained with the MRI-conditional bioptome were smaller compared with the commercial X-ray bioptome. Real-time MRI guidance significantly increased the diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy (82% vs. 56% on-target biopsy specimens with real-time MRI vs. X-ray guidance, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Endomyocardial biopsy performed using real-time MRI guidance is feasible and significantly improves the diagnostic yield compared with X-ray fluoroscopy guidance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogers et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: